http://www.catalystnyc.com/cofactors/2005/07/are-blogs-credible/ Welcome to CoFactors, the research + development crucible for Catalyst Group Design. Here, we expand and codify our observations and experience independent of clientdriven situations. Our position as consultants gives us an exceptionally broad view of the Web and interface design issues + culture. Feel free to link to our blog, send feedback, download white papers or even to read about developments in our own business. Sat, 22 May 2010 13:46:59 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.catalystnyc.com/cofactors/2005/07/are-blogs-credible/comment-page-1/#comment-87 Nick Gould Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:41:16 +0000 http://www.catalystgroupdesign.com/cofactors/?p=119#comment-87 I stand corrected. Although I did refer to it as a "major" dustup. Sorry, Robert. Didn't mean to minimize the situation. I stand corrected. Although I did refer to it as a “major” dustup. Sorry, Robert. Didn’t mean to minimize the situation.

]]> http://www.catalystnyc.com/cofactors/2005/07/are-blogs-credible/comment-page-1/#comment-86 Robert Scoble Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:35:25 +0000 http://www.catalystgroupdesign.com/cofactors/?p=119#comment-86 It's not just a "dustup." Orlowski is outright lying. Both about my email (I never ever wrote that) and about his reporting. Here's Microsoft's official response: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/444957.aspx It’s not just a “dustup.” Orlowski is outright lying. Both about my email (I never ever wrote that) and about his reporting. Here’s Microsoft’s official response: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/444957.aspx

]]>