<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdWords: Bad for Business?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catalystnyc.com/cofactors/2005/08/google-is-bad-for-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catalystnyc.com/cofactors/2005/08/google-is-bad-for-business/</link>
	<description>Welcome to CoFactors, the research + development crucible for Catalyst Group Design. Here, we expand and codify our observations and experience independent of clientdriven situations. Our position as consultants gives us an exceptionally broad view of the Web and interface design issues + culture. Feel free to link to our blog, send feedback, download white papers or even to read about developments in our own business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:41:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jung Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.catalystnyc.com/cofactors/2005/08/google-is-bad-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jung Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catalystgroupdesign.com/cofactors/?p=129#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I read your article in Digital Web.  Very nicely written, and probably one of the easiest article to understand on that site. 

Anyway, I also agree with your blog post.  AdWords for us resulted modest increase of email RFPs  with our address in CC field.  At first, we were happy to oblige to this crapshoot invitation.  But after watching our budget drain from indiscriminate clicks that were costing us $5 a pop, we had had it.  We got tired of being screened out for all the wrong reasons.   More insulting was the fact that most of the competing firms that advertised on AdWords provided atrocious template based designs at low cost.

Then it dawned on us that that&#039;s what the market demand.  Cheap web sites.  After about a year of trial, we puled all our Overture and Google keyword based campaigns. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your article in Digital Web.  Very nicely written, and probably one of the easiest article to understand on that site. </p>
<p>Anyway, I also agree with your blog post.  AdWords for us resulted modest increase of email RFPs  with our address in CC field.  At first, we were happy to oblige to this crapshoot invitation.  But after watching our budget drain from indiscriminate clicks that were costing us $5 a pop, we had had it.  We got tired of being screened out for all the wrong reasons.   More insulting was the fact that most of the competing firms that advertised on AdWords provided atrocious template based designs at low cost.</p>
<p>Then it dawned on us that that&#8217;s what the market demand.  Cheap web sites.  After about a year of trial, we puled all our Overture and Google keyword based campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

